![]() The result was that many websites were effectively constrained from using secure communications. For IPv6, it increases the administrative overhead by having multiple IPs on a single machine, even though the address space is not exhausted. Assigning a separate IP address for each site increases the cost of hosting, since requests for IP addresses must be justified to the regional Internet registry and IPv4 addresses are now exhausted. In practice, this meant that an HTTPS server could only serve one domain (or small group of domains) per IP address for secured and efficient browsing. Therefore, it was not possible for the server to use the information in the HTTP host header to decide which certificate to present and as such only names covered by the same certificate could be served from the same IP address. However, when using HTTPS, the TLS handshake happens before the server sees any HTTP headers. To achieve this, the server uses a hostname presented by the client as part of the protocol (for HTTP the name is presented in the host header). Name-based virtual hosting allows multiple DNS hostnames to be hosted by a single server (usually a web server) on the same IP address. Such "unified communications certificates" must be reissued every time the list of domains changes. It is possible to use subjectAltName to contain multiple domains controlled by one person in a single certificate. A server that is responsible for multiple hostnames is likely to need to present a different certificate for each name (or small group of names). However, it may be hard – or even impossible due to lack of a full list of all names in advance – to obtain a single certificate that covers all names a server will be responsible for. However, some applications allow the user to bypass the warning to proceed with the connection, with the user taking on the responsibility of trusting the certificate and, by extension, the connection. If a match is not found, the user may be warned of the discrepancy and the connection may abort as the mismatch may indicate an attempted man-in-the-middle attack. If a match occurs, the connection proceeds as normal. Once the server sends the certificate, the client examines it and compares the name it was trying to connect to with the name(s) included in the certificate. In more detail, when making a TLS connection, the client requests a digital certificate from the web server. Hence, if one server hosts multiple sites on a single listener, the server has no way to know which certificate to use in the TLS protocol. Prior to SNI, when making a TLS connection, the client had no way to specify which site it was trying to connect to. ![]() The SNI extension was specified in 2003 in RFC 3546. The desired hostname is not encrypted in the original SNI extension, so an eavesdropper can see which site is being requested. This also allows a proxy to forward client traffic to the right server during TLS/SSL handshake. It is the conceptual equivalent to HTTP/1.1 name-based virtual hosting, but for HTTPS. The extension allows a server to present one of multiple possible certificates on the same IP address and TCP port number and hence allows multiple secure ( HTTPS) websites (or any other service over TLS) to be served by the same IP address without requiring all those sites to use the same certificate. Server Name Indication ( SNI) is an extension to the Transport Layer Security (TLS) computer networking protocol by which a client indicates which hostname it is attempting to connect to at the start of the handshaking process. TLS extension for serve multiple HTTPS sites at the same IP address with different certificates
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |